Regents to back UC students protest at Capitol (correction)

Disclaimer: UC President Mark Yudof and regents be supporting students on the March 1st UCSA actions, not on the stated March 4th actions, however protests will take place on both dates.

Regents to back UC students protest at Capitol

Nanette Asimov, Chronicle Staff Writer

Thursday, January 21, 2010

After last fall’s angry and at times violent campus protests, it seems unlikely that rival students and leaders of the University of California would stand together to speak out on behalf of UC.

But when students hold their big Day of Action in Defense of Public Education on March 4, converging on Sacramento to lobby lawmakers for sufficient funding, several members of UC’s governing Board of Regents and UC President Mark Yudof said Wednesday they’ll be there with them.

“We need to be up there as regents and as students,” Dick Blum told his two dozen or so fellow regents meeting this week in San Francisco. UC chancellors, administrators and students also attended.

Other regents – not all – agreed.

“We all have to join together,” said Regent Leslie Tang Schilling.

“I’ll be there,” said Regent Frederick Ruiz.

“It certainly would be appropriate for us to join the students,” said Regent Charlene Zettel.

Even Yudof, the most frequent target of student fury in recent months, said he would join in.

“I think we can work together,” Yudof said. “We’re on the same wavelength.”

Volatile relationship

Unexpected words, given the escalating animosity in recent months.

The trouble began last summer with an $813 million hole in the UC budget. Yudof’s austerity plan included deep cuts on campuses: fewer courses, lecturers laid off, and pay cuts through furloughs.

Angry protesters disrupted the September regents meeting, and 14 were arrested. Days later, thousands of students and faculty walked out of classrooms across the state to protest UC leaders’ handling of the crisis.

Then in November, the regents agreed to raise tuition 32 percent for fall 2010, on top of a 9.3 percent increase approved in May.

Angry students threw food, sticks and vinegar-soaked bandannas at the UCLA building where the regents met. Dozens chased after Yudof and the regents as they left, with police in riot gear barely catching up.

At UC Berkeley, students occupied Wheeler Hall for hours, while some 2,000 supporters ringed the building. Helmeted police used metal gates to push the students back and beat some of their hands with batons.

The violence culminated in December, when police arrested eight people among dozens who broke windows and threw torches at UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau’s campus residence.

On Wednesday, perhaps thinking of such incidents, Regent Sherry Lansing said some regents “may not feel comfortable” supporting the students’ agenda for UC.

Common ground

But Victor Sanchez, president of the UC Student Association, told the regents he hopes “we can meet each other half way.” He described the March 4 event as part of a monthlong effort by students, from elementary schools to universities, to draw attention to the need to better fund public education.

He and the UC leaders agreed they have a common goal: getting lawmakers to look favorably on the stellar public university system as they try to knit together a $20 billion budget gap over the next six months.

“It’s a matter of seeing where we can collaborate,” Sanchez said, suggesting the regents help pay for buses to bring students to the Capitol.

Jesse Cheng, the student regent designate, said, “It’s time we went to Sacramento as a UC family and presented ourselves as a united front.”

The mood on campuses was less genial, in part because today the regents are set to approve millions of dollars of extra pay for a handful of UC executives who met performance goals.

“Yudof and the regents are a major part of the problem,” said UC Berkeley student activist Callie Maidhof. “It was not the state that decided to give these administrators enormous bonuses.

“This is just another attempt to co-opt the student movement when it’s very strong. I can tell you it won’t be successful. We won’t be deceived.”

The regents resume their meeting at 8:30 a.m. today.


4 responses to “Regents to back UC students protest at Capitol (correction)

  1. Pingback: Confusion, Criticism Over UC Regents Article « Student Activism

  2. Pingback: UC Activists Say Article Mangled Facts on March Plans « Student Activism

  3. In “6 months” school is out… and the bad boys will make for a clean get away…. shame on the meeting half-way…. there’s no halfway, halfway would mean their salaries get cut in half and our tuition too.

  4. UC Regents need to back saving $3,000,000 for students NOW! $3 Million Extravagant, Arrogant Spending by UC President Yudof for UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau to Hire Consultants – When Work Can Be Done Internally & Impartially

    These days, every dollar in higher education counts. Contact Chairwoman Budget Sub-committee on Education Finance Assemblywoman Carter 916.319.2062 and tell her to stop the $3,000,000 spending by Chancellor Birgeneau for consultants.

    Do the work internally at no additional costs with UCB Academic Senate Leadership (C. Kutz/F. Doyle), the world – class professional UCB faculty/ staff, & the UCB Chancellor’s bloated staff (G. Breslauer, N. Brostrom, F. Yeary, P. Hoffman, C. Holmes etc) & President Yudof.

    President Yudof’s UCB Chancellor should do the high paid work he is paid for instead of hiring expensive East Coast consults to do the work of his job. ‘World class’ smart executives like Chancellor Birgeneau need to do the hard work analysis, and make the tough-minded difficult, decisions to identify inefficiencies.

    Where do the $3,000,000 consultants get their recommendations?
    From interviewing the UCB senior management that hired them and approves their monthly consultant fees and expense reports. Remember the nationally known auditing firm who said the right things and submitted recommendations that senior management wanted to hear and fooled the public, state, federal agencies?

    $3 million impartial consultants never bite the hands (Chancellor Birgeneau/ Chancellor Yeary) that feed them!

    Mr. Birgeneau’s accountabilities include “inspiring innovation, leading change.” This involves “defining outcomes, energizing others at all levels and ensuring continuing commitment.” Instead of deploying his leadership and setting a good example by doing the work of his Chancellor’s job, Mr. Birgeneau outsourced his work to the $3,000,000 consultants. Doesn’t he engage UC and UC Berkeley people at all levels to examine inefficiencies and recommend $150 million of trims? Hasn’t he talked to Cornell and the University of North Carolina – which also hired the consultants — about best practices and recommendations that will eliminate inefficiencies?
    No wonder the faculty, staff, students, Senate & Assembly are angry and suspicious.

    In today’s recession economy three million dollars is a irresponsible price to pay when a knowledgeable ‘world-class’ UCB Chancellor and his bloated staff do not do the work of their jobs.

    Pick up the phone and call. Together, we will make a difference: save $3 million for students!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s